Indian Liberals
Our Campaigns:
Madhya Pradesh Liberals
Puducherry Liberals
Daman and Diu Liberals
Andhra Pradesh Liberals
Andaman and Nicobar Liberals
Nagaland Liberals
Indian Liberals
Karnataka Liberals
Sikkim Liberals
Himachal Pradesh Liberals
Free Market India
Haryana Liberals
Goa Liberals
UP Liberals
Kerala Liberals
Odisha Liberals
Uttarakhand Liberals
Assam Liberals
Electoral Reforms
Chandigarh Liberals
Chattisgarh Liberals
Siddaramiah For CM
Tamilnadu Liberals

Electoral Reforms

One of the major campaigns under Electoral Reforms is our support for Runoff Election model.

What is Runoff Election model?

In ROE model, people will vote for candidates in the first round like they do currently in the FPTP (First Past the Post) model. If a candidate secures 50% percent of the votes, he/she will be elected. If however, no candidate gets 50%, a run-off election will be called between the top two candidates to select the eventual winner.

Advantages of Run-off Elections:

1. Curb criminals and caste/religious fanatics:

The ability of criminals and caste/religious fanatics to win elections will be greatly reduced, since a majority of voters can be expected to vote out such candidates in the run-off round.

2. Encourage good candidates to contest elections:

People can vote for a good candidate without wondering if their vote will be wasted, since they might get a more decisive say in the run-off round. There will be a lesser need for 'strategic voting' by certain communities to prevent a candidate/party from winning.

3. True representatives, not Dynasties:

In PR system, family members and cronies of party leaders will become our representatives without having to directly face the electorate. In ROE, the family members of leaders also have to contest the election and win 50% votes.

4. No Appeasement:

In FPTP model, all major parties field candidates from the caste/community influential in respective constituencies even if better candidates are available. In the ROE model, the electorate can be expected to vote against such appeasement if someone outside that community makes it to the run-off round.

5. Unlike PR system, ROE doesn't give representation to fringe elements:

The biggest advantage of a FPTP model is the opportunity it gives for fringe elements to contest the elections and stay within constitutional methods, and not take up arms for example. A PR model might give representation to fringe elements even if they are a small minority in all constituencies. ROE model moderates the influence of fringe elements on the polity till it reaches a critical mass in atleast one constituency.

6. Moderate Coalitions:

Opportunistic pre-poll, post-poll and hidden alliances among political parties are a bane of our current system. In ROE model, all parties can contest elections on their own and based on their performance, decide to support other party candidates (whose ideology they are comfortable with) in the run-off round.

News relevant to this Campaign:

Varun Gandhi bats for electoral reforms at book launch - The Statesman
Presidential election 2017: 33 per cent lawmakers of electoral college have criminal cases against them - Financial Express
Arun Jaitley says cleaning up political funding next big reform after GST - Hindustan Times
On last day, EC Chief Nasim Zaidi warns against anonymous electoral bonds political funding - Daily News & Analysis
SC asks Govt why there is no law on appointment of CEC and ECs - Deccan Herald
Nasim Zaidi pushes for electoral reforms: On his way out, CEC fires shots at govt over transparency, political funding - Firstpost
Not consulted by govt on electoral bonds: CEC Nasim Zaidi - The Indian Express
Unwise proposal: On Election Commission seeking contempt powers - The Hindu
Election Commission seeks powers against contempt, here is a look at these laws in other countries - The Indian Express

Follow us: Twitter: @runoff_election Facebook Page: Electoral Reforms